Legal Opinion

United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of Metuchen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 16, 1964PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

2Per curiam

This ease involves the validity of a provision of a zoning ordinance prohibiting out door advertising signs other than those related to a business conducted on the premises. Off-premise signs are prohibited throughout the municipality. Plaintiff sought to erect one such sign in a business district and another in a manufacturing district. Defendant obtained summary judgment on motion. We reversed, holding that plaintiff was entitled to adduce facts in support of its constitutional challenges. United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of Metuchen, 35 N. J. 193…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

4Cited by46 opinions

  1. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bruce Boraas v. The Village of Belle Terre, an Incorporated MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  5. John Donnelly & Sons, Inc. v. Outdoor Advertising BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API