Legal Opinion

In Re Clark

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1965No. L. A. 28405PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Clark was convicted in 1962 on four counts of violating subdivision (a) of section 26104 of the Corporations Code by knowingly selling stock without a permit, and the judgment was affirmed (People v. Clark, 215 Cal.App.2d 734 [40 Cal.Rptr. 487] [petition for hearing denied]). We referred the matter to the State Bar for a report as to whether moral turpitude was involved and, if so found, for a recommendation as to discipline.

The Board of Governors found that moral turpitude was involved and recommends that Clark be suspended for three years. (There were no dissenting votes.) The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Werner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In Re HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Grove v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In Re AlkowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API