Legal Opinion

Grove v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1965No. S. F. No. 22071PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner, a member of the bar since June 17, 1959, was charged by a local administrative committee with violating his duty as an attorney (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6103) by misleading a judge (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6068, subd. (d)) and by committing acts of moral turpitude and dishonesty (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6106). The local committee found against petitioner. The Board of Governors agreed with the committee’s findings and recommended a three-month suspension.

In September 1961 Adell S. Benner retained petitioner, who maintains offices in Hayward, to represent her in an action for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pickering v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Linnick v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Higgins v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. McMahon v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Green v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Grove v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Lewis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Clancy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API