Grove v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner, a member of the bar since June 17, 1959, was charged by a local administrative committee with violating his duty as an attorney (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6103) by misleading a judge (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6068, subd. (d)) and by committing acts of moral turpitude and dishonesty (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6106). The local committee found against petitioner. The Board of Governors agreed with the committee’s findings and recommended a three-month suspension.
In September 1961 Adell S. Benner retained petitioner, who maintains offices in Hayward, to represent her in an action for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pickering v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Linnick v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Higgins v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- McMahon v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Green v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Grove v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Lewis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Clancy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.