In Re Alkow
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
— Harry Alkow, a 60-year-old attorney admitted to practice in 1927, was convicted in 1964 of manslaughter in the driving of a vehicle. (Pen. Code, § 192, subd. 3 (b).) He was placed on probation for three years upon specified conditions including, among others, that he serve 11 months in jail subject to the provisions of Penal Code section 1208, then known as the Work Furlough Rehabilitation Law, and that during the 11 months he practice law only at the office of a named attorney and make only “routine court appearances, no trials, no motions. ’ ’ He did not appeal.
We referred the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Werner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- In Re HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Alkow v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.