People v. Strassman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Edward A. Belcher, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Defendant was indicted for, and convicted of, the crime of perjury.
It was charged that in qualifying as a surety upon the bail bond of one Kate Farley, who had been held to answer upon a charge of grand larceny, the defendant falsely swore that he was the owner of a certain piece of real property in the city and county of San Francisco.
1. Upon the trial, evidence was introduced which traced the record title to the property into one Hilda Strassman, more than a year before the date of the alleged perjury. Here the evidence of ownership came to an end. No witnesses were called to prove, and no…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. CroganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Chute v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. AgnewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. DeysherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.