Hunter v. Hunter
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. McKinley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
The action was brought to annul a marriage between the parties entered into on the third day Of July, 1862, upon the ground that defendant had another husband to wit, Joseph Milam.
*264It is now conceded that defendant was married to Joseph Milam in February, 1858, when defendant was but fifteen years of age; that she lived with Milam as his wife for ten days, when she was taken away by her parents and went to Salt Lake. It does not appear how long she was absent from San Bernardino, but it could not have been a very long time, for she testified that she lived at San Bernardino after her marriage…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schmisseur v. BeatrieIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Klein v. LaudmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
- Town of Greensborough v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
- Lockhart v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Spears v. BurtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Starbuck v. . StarbuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. Le DouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. Leong FookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.