Legal Opinion

People v. O'Brien

California Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1900No. Crim. No. 604PublishedCited by 36 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. John Ellsworth, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

The defendant was convicted of rape. The appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. The points urged for reversal are, that the information was insufficient to sustain the judgment; that the verdict was contrary to the evidence; and that there were errors in the instructions and in the admission of evidence.

The offense charged, as alleged in the information, and as defined in the instructions, consisted in the defendant’s having sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix, “who (it is alleged) was .... prevented from resisting said act . . . . hy certain…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. RectorNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  3. People v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. People v. TomlinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. People v. LeyshonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re BushmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. McKayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. State v. MarrenIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  5. United States v. Moreno-FloreanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API