Legal Opinion

People v. Agnew

California Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1940No. Crim. 4309PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPENCE, J., pro tem.

Defendant was charged in three counts, the third count charging false imprisonment by violence, menace, fraud and deceit, a violation of sections 236 and 237 of the Penal Code. He was acquitted on the first two counts but was found guilty on the third count of false imprisonment, a misdemeanor, being a lesser offense included in the charge contained in said third count. Pie was sentenced to six months imprisonment in the county jail and he appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

This prosecution was the aftermath of certain…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. Le DouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. People v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. People v. BushtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People v. Hong Ah DuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. People v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. TewksburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Cervantez v. J. C. Penney Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API