State v. Herrera
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT
DAVIS, J.
The three appellants were jointly indicted for perjury. The indictment charged that each of them was called and sworn as a witness and each gave certain false testimony. All three were convicted. They now object to the indictment and assign as error that the charges against them were improperly joined. The indictment amounted to three separate accusations, one against each of the appellants. Perjury by its very nature is an individual offense which may not to be committed by several persons together. The indictment was faulty in charging against the three…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Hull v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. StrassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. HooverOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. RogersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- The People v. RichieIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.