Legal Opinion

People v. Odom

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 1, 1996No. 96SA26PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline proceeding defaulted before the supreme court grievance committee and has not appeared in this court. A hearing panel of the grievance committee approved a hearing board’s findings and recommendation that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for three years and be required to make certain restitution. We accept the panel’s recommendations.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1979. The respondent did not answer the formal complaint filed by the assistant disciplinary counsel, and the allegations of fact contained…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CrimaldiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. People v. RauboltSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. RishelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. People v. CarvellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. People v. ShockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. People v. McCaffreySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API