Legal Opinion

People v. McCaffrey

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1996No. 96SA258PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline ease was convicted of two felonies and seri ously neglected three client matters. A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendations of the hearing board that the respondent be suspended for three years and that certain conditions be imposed on any future reinstatement. It is a close question whether a three-year suspension is adequate, or whether disbarment is the more appropriate sanction, but we have decided to accept the panel’s and board’s recommendations.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CrimaldiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. People v. OdomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. RauboltSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MannixSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. McCaffrey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. People v. HookSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. People v. PrimaveraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. People v. WhiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API