Legal Opinion

People v. Pierson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 20, 1996No. 96SA77PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline proceeding defaulted before the grievance committee and has not appeared before this court. A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved a hearing board’s findings and recommendation that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year and one day, with reinstatement conditioned on certain restitution. Given the seriousness of the respondent’s dishonest conduct and his utter disregard for these proceedings, however, we conclude that a three-year suspension is warranted.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CrimaldiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. People v. OdomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. RauboltSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. MadiganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re StevensonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. People v. RishelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. People v. PaulsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. People v. HolmesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API