Legal Opinion

People v. Rishel

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 9, 1998No. 97SA404PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings of a hearing board that the respondent had seriously neglected two client matters. The respondent defaulted before the hearing board and has not appeared in this court. The hearing panel also approved the board’s recommendation that the respondent be suspended for one year and one day, with special conditions for reinstatement. We accept the hearing panel’s recommendations and suspend the respondent for a year and a day with special conditions.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1984. He did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. TownshendSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. People v. OdomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. CarvellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. People v. ShockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. In Re DemaraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. In re BauderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. People v. RishelSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API