Legal Opinion

People v. Shock

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 4, 1999No. 98SA363PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a lawyer discipline case. The respondent, Joel Edward Shock, defaulted before the hearing board and has not appeared in this court. A hearing panel of the grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of the board that the respondent be suspended for three years. We accept the recommendation and order that the respondent be suspended for three years.

I

Joel Edward Shock was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1985. Because he did not answer the complaint filed in this case, the hearing board entered a default against him causing the allegations in the complaint to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. TownshendSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. RishelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. People v. OdomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. HolmesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re BilderbackSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. In Re DemaraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. People v. CarriganSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  4. People v. HolcombSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  5. People v. SegallSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API