Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 1, 1993No. 92SA412PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this attorney disciplinary proceeding defaulted before the Supreme Court Grievance Committee and has not appeared in this court. A hearing panel of the committee approved the recommendation of the hearing board that the resppndent be disbarred, be ordered to pay restitution, and be assessed the costs of the proceeding. We accept the panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to the bar of this court on October 21, 1976, is registered as an attorney upon this court’s official records, and is subject to the jurisdiction of this court and its grievance committee.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CrimaldiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. SouthernSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. WolfeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. TuckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. People v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. People v. FritscheSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. OdomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. People v. SilvolaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API