Legal Opinion

People v. Raubolt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 18, 1992No. 92SA31PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this attorney disciplinary proceeding did not appear or answer the complaint filed by the assistant disciplinary counsel. A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the findings of the hearing board and recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year and one day, that he be ordered to make restitution, and that he be assessed the costs of the proceeding. We accept the findings of the panel and the board, but conclude that a longer period of suspension is warranted because of the seriousness of the misconduct. We order…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CrimaldiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. People v. FloresSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. People v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. People v. OdomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. SingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People v. ReganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API