Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Lalanne

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 12, 1937No. Civ. 11481PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Plaintiff, a pedestrian, was crossing La Salle Street in Culver City when he was struck by an automobile driven by defendant. He brought this action for damages claiming negligence on the part of defendant. From a judgment in defendant’s favor entered upon the return of a jury’s verdict he prosecutes this appeal.

Plaintiff complains of the ruling of the trial court in refusing to give to the jury an instruction in the following language: “You are instructed that the plaintiff and the defendant were both chargeable only with the exercise of ordinary care, but a greater amount of such care was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Raymond v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Vedder v. BireleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Pinello v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Weihe v. Rathjen Mercantile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. McNear v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Lasater v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Menchaca v. Helms Bakeries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Kuist v. CurranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API