Pinello v. Taylor
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs are husband and wife. This is an action for damages for injuries sustained by the wife, alleged to have been struck by an automobile operated by defendant, while the said wife was attempting to walk across Geary Street at its intersection with Ninth Avenue in the city of San Francisco.
The case was tried by a jury, verdict was rendered in favor of defendant, a motion for a new trial was denied and judgment was thereupon entered for said defendant, and from this judgment plaintiffs have appealed.
As grounds for reversal appellants contend that the court erred in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Burgesser v. Bullock'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Sun Pacific Farming Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- McNear v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Salomon v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.