Kuist v. Curran
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PATROSSO, J. pro tem.
In this action for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendants entered upon the verdict of the jury.
The accident in question occurred near the southeast corner of the intersection of Fletcher and Riverside Drives in the city of Los Angeles, at or about 4 o’clock in the afternoon. The former runs in a general northerly and southerly direction and the latter in a general easterly and westerly direction. Appellant is a newspaper vendor, and at about 4 o’clock on the day in question was standing in the middle of Fletcher Drive approximately…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Raymond v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Vedder v. BireleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Dougherty v. EllingsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Pinello v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Weihe v. Rathjen Mercantile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Rocky Mountain Produce Trucking Co. v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- Newton v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Cummings v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Thompson v. KecklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.