Kiebach v. Kiebach
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chief Justice.
This was a suit to foreclose a vendor’s lien on a farm in Rock •county, Minnesota. Plaintiffs prevailed in the trial court. Defendants moved for amended findings or in the alternative for a new trial. Both motions were denied and judgment entered. Defendants come here on what purports to be an appeal from the order denying a new trial and from the judgment.
In 1922, Ernest Kiebach, a well-to-do farmer, the owner of four iarms in southwestern Minnesota, as well as considerable other property, sought to arrange his estate so that in its final distribution his seven children…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Malchow v. MalchowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Seitz v. Union Brass & Metal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Smith v. KippSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Raymond v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Wilson v. MolineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Hall-Vesole Co. v. Durkee-Atwood Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Ulmers v. WillinghamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.