Hall-Vesole Co. v. Durkee-Atwood Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The evidence was presented before a jury, and during the court’s charge the parties agreed that three interrogatories should be submitted to the jury. All other questions involved were, by stipulation, submitted to the court for findings and conclusions upon the jury’s answers to the interrogatories and the evidence in the case. Plaintiff prevailed on the interrogatories, the findings, and the conclusions of the court.
Hall-Vesole Company, a corporation, brought suit to recover for alleged…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Perkins v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Young v. . HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Lockwood v. . ThorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Newburger-Morris Co. v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Ruffner, Donnally & Co. v. Hewitt, Kercheval & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1874
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Cavanagh v. Bostitch, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1960
- Trimble Cattle Co. v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Roehrdanz v. SchlinkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Cavanagh v. Bostitch, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1960