Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway Employees
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover upon an accident and illness income policy of insurance issued by the defendant to the plaintiff. There was judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
When the insured truthfully states the facts relative to his condition of health and the presence or absence of disease and as to the attendance of a physician, and the general manager of the insurer, soliciting the insurance, writes his answers incorrectly in the application, and the insured is without knowledge that the an-Swers are incorrectly written and is not at fault in not knowing, he may recover upon the policy…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kausal v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- McAlpine v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Malchow v. MalchowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Seitz v. Union Brass & Metal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kellerman v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Martens v. MartensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Alsdorf v. SvobodaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Fohl v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.