Seitz v. Union Brass & Metal Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
This is an action by the plaintiff, a minority stockholder, to compel the defendant corporation to declare a dividend and to compel certain officers to pay into the corporate treasury money alleged to have been wrongfully paid and received as excessive salaries. There were findings requiring the corporation to declare a special dividend of 10 per cent, but refusing to compel the individual defendants to restore salaries received. The plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The trouble between the plaintiff and the defendant Theodore Michel, or between the plaintiff…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jones v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Seitz v. MichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Fillebrown v. HaywardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Matthews v. Headley Chocolate Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- Malchow v. MalchowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Blish v. Thompson Automatic Arms Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1948
- Cole Real Estate Corp. v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Gallin v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1934
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.