Legal Opinion
Raymond v. McKenzie
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 22, 1945No. 34,014PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Magney, Justice.
The court found for defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the order ■denying his motion for a new trial.
In the fall of 1942, plaintiff desired to purchase the so-called Wescott farm in Dakota county. He made a deposit of $175 on an agreed purchase price of $5,500. The agreement was made with defendant George A. McKenzie, Jr. McKenzie was the owner of a six-tenths interest in the farm, and defendants George Wescott and his brother, James, each owned a two-tenths interest. James lived in Idaho. Plaintiff was told that George Wescott’s approval of the sale would have to be obtained.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schwab v. BaremoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Dana v. St. Paul Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Smith v. KippSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Joslyn v. SchwendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Mackey v. AmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Abdallah, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Space Center, Inc. v. 451 CORP.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.