Lee v. Hensley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, J.—
This appeal comes to us on the judgment roll alone, consisting of a second amended complaint, a general and special demurrer thereto, and a judgment of dismissal predicated upon an order sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend.
The main question is the sufficiency of the complaint, as amended, to constitute a cause of action. It alleges generally that plaintiff is an Indian member of the Cherokee Indian Nation; that William J. Hensley, hereinafter referred to as defendant, a white man, married plaintiff’s mother, Daisy Lee Hensley; that plaintiff lived with them but was not…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Diodes, Inc. v. FranzenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Vallejo Development Co. v. Beck Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Ramey v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1959
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.