Legal Opinion
Diodes, Inc. v. Franzen
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 1968No. Civ. 30896PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHufstedler, J.
—Plaintiff, Diodes, Incorporated (“Diodes”), appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants Franzen, Stump, Semtech Corporation (“Semtech”) and Continental Device Corporation (“Continental”), entered after defendants’ general and special demurrers to the third amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend. On appeal plaintiff contends that the third amended complaint pleaded facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action on the theories of “fraud and conspiracy,” based upon claimed breach of fiduciary duties owed by the individual defendants to the plaintiff, for which the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun ThanooCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Cheramie Services, Inc. v. Shell Deepwater Production, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- Trandes Corporation v. Guy F. Atkinson Company, and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Reeves v. HanlonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.