Legal Opinion
Ramey v. General Petroleum Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 28, 1959No. Civ. 23587PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered after the sustaining of demurrers without leave to amend. The plaintiff herein was injured in an accident on April 16, 1953, and filed a complaint against General Petroleum Corporation and Pacific Drilling Control Company, John Doe and Richard Roe, on March 27, 1958. The plaintiff, in effect, sought to excuse the delay and the bar of the statute of limitations of one year upon the ground of fraudulent concealment. Demurrers by General Petroleum Corporation and by Pacific Drilling Control Company were sustained, and plaintiff was given 30 days within…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.