Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Nolan
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 1936No. Civ. 11161PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Defendant, an actor, appeals from a judgment in the sum of $10,000 rendered in an action based upon a contract in which defendant engaged the services of plaintiff’s assignors to act as his personal represéntatives and managers in the motion picture industry.
The contract in question is in the form of a letter directed jointly to plaintiff’s assignors, Jane Broder, New York City, and Small-Landau Company, Hollywood, California. It is dated May 9, 1934, and at the bottom of the letter after the word “accepted” the two assignors signed their names. The contract provided in part as follows: “I…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Pacific Steam Whaling Co. v. Alaska Packers' Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Strand Improvement Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Mandel v. LiebmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Roy v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Whitney Investment Co. v. Westview Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.