Legal Opinion
Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
California Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1943No. L. A. 18395PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Appellants in this case were the holders of noneaneellable (non-can) disability insurance policies issued by The Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California, called the old company. They belong to the same general group of “non-can” policyholders referred to in the" ease of Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual etc. Co., 22 Cal.2d 77 [136 P.2d 779], They gave notice of rejection of the reinsurance offered by Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company, the new company, in conformity with the rehabilitation and reinsurance agreement and plan discussed in the above-cited case, and within the proper…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. Security Life Insurance & Annuity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Bellman v. San Francisco High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. DuaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Brownell Combs, Ii, Administrator C.T.A. Of the Estate of Leslie Combs, Ii, Deceased v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Vestar Development Ii, Llc, an Arizona Limited Liability v. General Dynamics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.