Pacific Steam Whaling Co. v. Alaska Packers' Ass'n
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
Each of the parties to this action is a corporation, and at the time of the occurrences out of which the litigation here involved arose both of the parties were engaged in catching salmon along the shore of Alaska, at and near the mouth of Karluk River, in and near and about Tanglefoot Bay, Karluk Beach, and Tanglefoot Beach, and each had plants in the vicinity at which the fish were canned. The action is for damages for alleged wrongful acts, by which defendant, during the fishing season of 1897, unlawfully and forcibly excluded plaintiff from fishing in the ocean in the localities above…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Mann v. Tacoma Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Lamb v. HarbaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Clemente v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.