Legal Opinion

Harris v. . Bennett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1912PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal by defendants from Garter, J., at March Term, 1912, of Nash. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice Walicer.

1Opinion of the Court

"Walker, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover the possession of the land described in their complaint, it being a part of the “Culpepper place,” formerly belonging to tbe late Nicholas "W. Arrington, who, by Ms will, devised it to liis daughter, Tempie Ann Harris, for life, with remainder to her heirs, who are the plaintiffs. Mr. Arrington died in the year 1865, insolvent. He owed a very large sum, which his assets were wholly insufficient to pay. He appointed L. N. B. and L. F. Battle his executors, who qualified as such, and in 1868 commenced a special proceeding before…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hoke v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
  2. Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Smith v. Proctor.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Roberts v. . AllmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Rollins v. . HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Moore v. . PackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Duffer v. . BrunsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Brown v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Jones-Onslow Land Co. v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. King v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API