Legal Opinion

McPhee v. Lavin

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1920No. L. A. No. 5167PublishedCited by 37 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

This appeal is from a judgment for plaintiff for injuries caused by an automobile collision. The principal point presented is on the contention of appellant that the record discloses contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff.

The parties, each driving an automobile, were approaching the crossing of. intersecting streets in the city of Anaheim, the plaintiff going west on the north side of Center Street and the defendant going south on the west side of Claudina Street. The main facts in the case as found by the trial court and supported by the undisputed weight of the evidence, show that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Blackburn v. MarpleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Freeman v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Handley v. LombardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Dullanty v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Walter v. EnglandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. King v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API