Legal Opinion

Moore v. Morris

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided November 13, 1996No. 03-96-00045-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Justice.

Appellee Don Gidden sued Gerald Moore and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (collectively “Merrill Lynch”), appellants, claiming misrepresentations and violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”), Tex. Bus. & Com.Code Ann. §§ 17.41-63 (West 1987 & Supp.1996). Merrill Lynch filed a plea in abatement and motion to compel arbitration based on account agreements between the parties. The trial court denied both the plea and motion. Merrill Lynch attacks the court’s order refusing to compel arbitration in parallel proceedings by seeking mandamus relief…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Prudential Securities Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cantella & Co., Inc. v. GoodwinTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. BWI Companies, Inc. v. Beck, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Bruce Terminix Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Russ Berrie and Co., Inc. v. Gantt, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999
  3. Bruce Terminix Co. v. Carroll, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  4. VIREO PLLC v. Cates, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  5. Vireo, P.L.L.C. V. CatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API