Legal Opinion

In Re Bruce Terminix Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1998No. 98-0030PublishedCited by 286 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original proceeding seeking relief from the denial of a plea in abatement and motion to compel arbitration. Because the trial court abused its discretion in finding that relator waived arbitration and because relator has no adequate remedy by appeal, we conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus.

In 1990, Kay Bates contracted with relator Bruce Terminix Company for residential termite extermination services. The contract contained an arbitration clause. 1 After Ter-minix failed to rid Bates’s house of termites, she filed suit against Terminix on February 28,1994. Bates…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Prudential Securities Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. EZ Pawn Corp. v. ManciasTexas Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by286 opinions

  1. Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. G.T. Leach Builders, LLC v. Sapphire V.P., LpTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In Re AIU Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re Vesta Insurance Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006

281 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API