Legal Opinion

Bruce Terminix Co. v. Carroll

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided October 15, 1997No. 10-97-230-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CUMMINGS, Justice.

In this original proceeding, the Relator, Bruce Terminix Company, seeks a writ of mandamus to require the trial court to submit the dispute to arbitration. We decline to issue the writ.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This original proceeding stems from a contract dispute between Terminix, the defendant in the underlying suit, and Kay Bates, the plaintiff. In 1990, Bates entered into a contract with Terminix in which Terminix agreed to protect Bates’ home from termites. The contract contained the following provision:

10. ARBITRATION. The Purchaser and Terminix agree…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,790 Rayford Price and Barbara Ashley Price v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. And George WilmotCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Guaranty County Mutual Insurance Co. v. ReynaTexas Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Bruce Terminix Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. in Re Fleetwood Homes of Texas, L.P., and Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API