Legal Opinion

Cantella & Co., Inc. v. Goodwin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1996No. 95-0819PublishedCited by 239 opinions

1Per curiam

In this original proceeding, Cantella & Company seeks relief from the trial court’s order denying arbitration of the City of Luf-kin’s suit against Cantella arising from a securities transaction. Because the parties entered into a valid arbitration agreement under the Federal Arbitration Act (the FAA) 1 , we conditionally grant mandamus relief.

In 1993, Cantella and the City entered into a “Client’s Agreement” whereby Cantella agreed to handle securities transactions for the City. The agreement has an arbitration clause. It provides that “all controversies which may arise between us ... shall…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Thigpen v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Prudential Securities Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Freis v. CanalesTexas Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by239 opinions

  1. In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re D. Wilson Const. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  4. EZ Pawn Corp. v. ManciasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re Poly-America, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008

234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API