Vireo, P.L.L.C. V. Cates
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentJones, Justice
The central issue in this case is whether a party waives its right to arbitration when it files suit in court to resolve disputes that are not subject to the parties’ arbitration agree*495ment. The majority answers the question “yes.” Because the majority misapplies well-established precedent regarding the waiver of a contractual right to arbitration, I respectfully dissent.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The majority’s statement of the factual and procedural background is essentially correct. Because the trial court’s order denying plaintiffs’ motion to compel arbitration was rendered before…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Prudential Securities Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1995
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.