Russ Berrie and Co., Inc. v. Gantt
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUSAN LARSEN, Justice.
This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a motion to compel arbitration and stay litigation. Finding no evidence in this record that the parties’ contract had a substantial affect upon commerce, we initially determine that the Texas General Arbitration Act applies, 1 rather than the Federal Arbitration Act, 2 that this interlocutory appeal is appropriate, and we therefore have jurisdiction. We next determine that the agreement here, an at-will contract with a binding arbitration clause interpreted under New Jersey law, is not illusory. We therefore…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- EZ Pawn Corp. v. ManciasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Pepe International Development Co. v. Pub Brewing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- In Re Conseco Finance Servicing Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
- In Re Turner Bros. Trucking Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- Southwind Group, Inc. v. Landwehr, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2006
- In Re Phelps Dodge Magnet Wire Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.