Legal Opinion

Prudential Securities Inc. v. Marshall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1995No. 95-0698PublishedCited by 431 opinions

1Per curiam

Prudential Securities Incorporated, John Rhoades, Kevin O’Friel, Kent Varner, Joe Nittolo, and Mike McClain seek mandamus relief from a trial court order denying arbitration of several libel and slander claims asserted against them by the real parties in interest, former Prudential stockbrokers Edwin Troy Hawkins and Francis Moise. Because we conclude that the claims are within the scope of arbitration agreements Hawkins and Moise entered into with Prudential, we conditionally grant the relief requested.

While employed at Prudential, Hawkins and Moise each signed Uniform Applications for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by431 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. United States Ex Rel. Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  5. Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008

426 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API