Legal Opinion

Samsel v. Allstate Insurance

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2002No. CV-01-0158-PRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MYERS, Judge.*

¶ 1 Defendant/Appellant Allstate Insurance Co. appealed from an adverse summary judgment on a claim for breach of the medical payments coverage provisions of an automobile policy Allstate issued to Plaintiffs/Appellees Michael and Cynthia Samsel. The court of appeals affirmed, holding that reasonable medical expenses paid on behalf of Lisa Samsel, the injured party, by her health maintenance organization (HMO) were expenses actually incurred by Lisa for purposes of Allstate’s medical payments coverage, notwithstanding the provisions of A.R.S. § 20-1072. Samsel v. Allstate…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Black v. American Bankers Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Winter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Farmer-Cummings v. Personnel Pool of Platte CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  5. Walter Ansley v. Banner Health NetworkArizona Supreme Court · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API