Parnell v. Adventist Health System/West
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
Under the Hospital Lien Act (HLA; Civ. Code, §§ 3045.1-3045.6), 1 a hospital that treats a patient injured by a third party tortfeasor may assert a lien against any judgment, settlement, or compromise recovered by that patient from the tortfeasor in the amount of its “reasonable and necessary charges” (§ 3045.1). In this case, a hospital received payment from a patient and his health insurer and agreed to accept that payment as “payment in full” for its services. Nonetheless, the hospital asserted a lien under the HLA, seeking to recover the difference between its usual and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Howell v. HAMILTON MEATS & PROVISIONS, INC.California Supreme Court · 2011
- Katiuzhinsky v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Gister v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Dameron Hospital Ass'n v. AAA Northern California Nevada & Utah Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Roberts v. University of Alabama HospitalCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.