Legal Opinion

Parnell v. Adventist Health System/West

California Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2005No. S114888PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

Under the Hospital Lien Act (HLA; Civ. Code, §§ 3045.1-3045.6), 1 a hospital that treats a patient injured by a third party tortfeasor may assert a lien against any judgment, settlement, or compromise recovered by that patient from the tortfeasor in the amount of its “reasonable and necessary charges” (§ 3045.1). In this case, a hospital received payment from a patient and his health insurer and agreed to accept that payment as “payment in full” for its services. Nonetheless, the hospital asserted a lien under the HLA, seeking to recover the difference between its usual and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Howell v. HAMILTON MEATS & PROVISIONS, INC.California Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Katiuzhinsky v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Gister v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Dameron Hospital Ass'n v. AAA Northern California Nevada & Utah Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Roberts v. University of Alabama HospitalCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API