Wainscott v. Centura Health Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*517Opinion by
JUDGE NAVARRO
{ 1 In this case, we consider whether substantial compliance may be sufficient to satis- © fy the filing and notice provisions of Colorado's hospital lien statute. Because minor filing and notice deficiencies should not invalidate an otherwise valid hospital lien, we conclude that substantial compliance suffices. A lienholder substantially complies when it satisfies the statute's purposes through timely actual notice of the lien to those against whom the Henholder attempts to enforce the lien.
12 Defendant, Centura Health Corporation (Centura), appeals the district…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jamison v. EncarnacionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Cirrincione v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- v. Centura Health CorporationColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
- Fischer v. Colorow Health Care, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Rocky Mountain Exploration, Inc. v. Davis Graham & Stubbs LLPColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Martinez v. Mintz Law Firm, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Perfect Place, LLC v. SemlerColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.