Legal Opinion
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Barrett
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 19, 2004No. Nos. 03-2287-GTV, 03-2543-GTV, 03-2544-GTV, 03-2585-GTV, 03-2604-GTVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VANBEBBER, Senior District Judge.
In these cases, Plaintiff DIRECTV alleges that the defendants surreptitiously intercepted and decrypted DIRECTV’s satellite signals using devices intended for that purpose, ultimately to gain free viewing of satellite television programming. The cases arise out of DIRECTV’s acquisition of shipping records of distributors of devices intended for satellite television signal interception and decryption. DIRECTV brings five Counts against each defendant in each case. Counts One and Four concern violations of the Cable Communications Policy Act.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- DirecTV, Inc. v. HoseyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- DirecTV, Inc. v. BoggessDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004
- DIRECTV v. LoussaertDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barber v. America's Wholesale LenderDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
- Ex Parte Flexible Products Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Sprint Communications Co. v. Theglobe.com, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. WoodruffDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2011
- Bice v. Micon Products International, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.