Legal Opinion
Bice v. Micon Products International, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 3, 2005No. 1040450PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Justice.
This petition for a writ of mandamus arises from a number of actions in which *371,675 plaintiffs, all individuals who claim that they were injured by exposure to isocyanate1 while employed as coal miners, have sued 11 defendants, including Flexible Products Company and Micon Products International, Inc., all of which are involved in the manufacture, use, and distribution of isocyanate. The defendants seek an order from this Court requiring the trial court to set aside its case-management order (“CMO”), which consolidates the underlying actions and sets out various guidelines for…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Leonard J. Klay v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ex Parte Flexible Products Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999