Legal Opinion

Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1974No. 73-1884PublishedCited by 426 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

Nathaniel Mosley and nine other persons joined in bringing this action individually and as class representatives alleging that their rights guaranteed under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 were denied by General Motors and Local 25, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agriculture Implement Workers of America [Union] by reason of their color and race. Each of the ten named plaintiffs had, prior to the filing of the complaint, filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [EEOC] asserting the facts underlying these claims. Pursuant thereto, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Richard JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Lee v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by426 opinions

  1. Kehr Ex Rel. Kehr v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  2. Coughlin v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Alexander v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Prempro Products Liability Litigation v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

421 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API