Legal Opinion
DIRECTV v. Loussaert
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided October 2, 2003No. 3:03-CV-40053PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT EVERSOLL’S MOTION TO SEVER
GRITZNER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Eversoll’s Motion to Sever filed June 26, 2003 (Clerk’s No. 10). Defendant asks the Court to sever the action against him pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 42; however, he concedes that the relief he requests is properly pleaded pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 20 and 21. The Court addresses the motion accordingly.
FACTS
DIRECTV, a California-based company, develops satellite systems which transmit di*640gitalized signals to homes and businesses…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. 11C MusicDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2001
- Movie Systems, Inc. v. AbelDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ex Parte Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- In Re Diet DrugsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Smith v. Planned Parenthood of St. Louis RegionDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2004
- Bass v. Anoka CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- DirecTV, Inc. v. BoggessDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.