Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

DirecTV, Inc. v. Hosey

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 11, 2003No. CIV.A.03-2278-GTVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VanBEBBER, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff DIRECTV alleges that Defendants surreptitiously intercepted and decrypted DIRECTV’S satellite signals using devices intended for that purpose, ultimately to gain free viewing of satellite television programming. The case arises out of Plaintiffs acquisition of shipping records of distributors of devices intended for satellite television signal interception and decryption. Plaintiff brings five Counts against each Defendant in its Complaint. Counts One and Four of Plaintiffs Complaint concern violations of the Cable Communications…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. DIRECTV, Inc. v. RobsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Ex Parte Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. DirecTV, Inc. v. BoggessDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004
  4. DIRECTV, Inc. v. BarrettDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  5. DirecTV, Inc. v. PahnkeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API