Legal Opinion
Barber v. America's Wholesale Lender
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided February 25, 2013No. 8.12-CV-01124-T-27TBMPublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, District Judge.
ON JANUARY 17, 2013, Plaintiffs were directed to show cause in writing why all claims other than those asserted by Sean and Kristina Barber against America’s Wholesale Lender should not be severed and dismissed without prejudice (Dkt. 105). Plaintiffs responded to the Order by arguing that their claims satisfy the permissive joinder requirements under Rule 20, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, both for transactional relatedness and commonality (Dkt. 109). Because Plaintiffs have failed to establish that their claims arise out of the same transaction,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Rhodes v. Target Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
- Karen Vanover v. NCO Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Alhassid v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Gonzalez-Camacho v. Banco Popular De P.R.United States District Court · 2018
- Petersen v. Bank of America Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.