Legal Opinion

Cortez Oil Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1937No. 23027PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

This cause arose out of a proceeding in 1930 by the tax ferret of Creek county under sections 12346 and 12350, O. S. 1931, to assess for ad valorem taxation certain alleged omitted property of the defendant, Cortez Oil Company, for the year 1915'.

After hearing the matter the county treasurer ordered an additional assessment against the defendant, Cortez Oil Company, and upon appeal to the county court a de novo trial judgment was there rendered ordering further assessments against the defendant for the year 1915.

The defendant, Cortez Oil Company, here urges that such judgment was not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Champlin Refining Co. v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Bartlesville Interurban Ry. Co. v. QuaidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. In Re Daniel's Omitted PropertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. State v. R. C. Jones & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Winemiller v. LortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. H. D. Youngman Contractor, Inc. v. GirdnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. State v. Chickasha Milling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API