Champlin Refining Co. v. Donnell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for damages based upon a verdict of a jury in a proceeding to condemn, under tbe eminent domain statute, an easement for an oil or oil and gas pipe line across the land of defendant in error.
The proceedings wore commenced by plaintiff in error, designated as plaintiff below. Commissioners were appointed, who viewed the premises and made an award. Defendant in error, designated in the trial court as defendant, being dissatisfied with the award of the commissioners, filed her written demand for “a jury trial on the amount of her damages and compensation,” and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kansas Central Railway Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Patch v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- St. Louis, El Reno & Western Railway Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Spurrier Lumber Co. v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Manning v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Eberle v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Wilkerson v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- City of McAlester v. DelcielloSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.